In what is an instructive example of the ever shifting landscape of art history, and the mercurial nature of the past in general, a painting in the Dallas Museum of Art that had long ben attributed to the hand of Hudson River School painter Asher B. Durand has been reassigned to George Inness, another great American landscape painter.
Inness was very much influenced by Durand, particularly early in his career, and went on to become even more well known than the elder artist.
Attribution of the painting had been in question, and was borderline to being reduced to “Attributed to Durand” status. Associate Curator of American Art Pauline Gill studied the painting, which was in storage, and in a search for possible alternative attribution, came across a pen and ink drawing by George Inness from the Princeton University Art Museum which appears to be a potential study for the painting.
An expert on Inness was called in and the painting has been reattributed to the more well known artist.
In a demonstration of the little realized fact that a large percentage of the titles of historic artworks are given by curators and art dealers after the fact and not named by the artists themselves, the painting has been retitled from “In the Woods”, a title in keeping with Durand’s works, to “Stream in the Mountains”, a title more in line with the themes associated with Inness’ work of the period.
Unfortunately, the museum’s website, in accord with the apparent unwritten standards of PR cluelessness demonstrated by a huge number of art museum websites, has not capitalized on the news by publishing an article and image accessible from the home page, but has instead left the story to languish in an unillustrated press release.
The local and national press have done a better job of covering and promoting the story.
I couldn’t even come up with an image of the work on the museum’s site by searching the collections for either Durand, Inness or the alternative names given to the work (sigh).
2 Replies to “Durand reattributed to Inness”
Sounds like the museum doesn’t even realize what they have. An Inness is way more impressive than a Durand in my book.
Thanks for the comment, Greg.
I think they’re aware of the importance of the attribution. I just think they fail to realize the the story could be a much better PR boost for the museum than they are taking advantage of, Just a few photos and a linked article on the website could help generate interest in the museum and its collection in general.
Comments are closed.