Pomegranates and Other Fruit in a Landscape, Abraham Brueghel
In the Metropolitan Museum of Art; use the download or zoom links under their image.
This 17th century still life is an example of how tenuous the attribution of historic art can be. Over time, it has been ascribed to Diego Velázquez, Giuseppe Ruoppoli, and Giovanni Paolo Spadino.
The current attribution is to Flemish painter Abraham Brueghel (son of Jan Brueghel the Younger, grandson of Jan Brueghel the Elder and great Grandson of Pieter Brueghel the Elder, quite a family heritage).
Still life set against a landscape is not an unusual compositional device in painting, but this one looks wonderfully strange. If you take the background shapes to be mountains, the three fruits in the background are atop and escarpment, and those in the right foreground seem to hang above a waterfall.
Whether still life at a giant scale is actually the artists intention, I don’t know, but I enjoy being able to interpret it that way. I also like the tiny (and/or giant) lizard in the foreground.
Regardless of illusions of scale — intended or imagined on my part — it’s a beautiful still life.
It’s naturalistic at a distance, but I love how brushy and painterly this is in close-up — wonderful for a 17th century still life — the apples, figs and grapes look as though they might have come off the brush of Manet, 200 year later.
8 Replies to “Eye Candy for Today: Abraham Brueghel still life”
Could it also be that Mr. Brueghel spilled his basket of fruit while crossing a creek, and then sat down and painted the resulting arrangement?
Thank you for another great post.
… may be they all worked on it. That will really screw up their attributions.
I do like your comparison to Manet (let’s attribute it to him next!) not just for his brushwork but also because his own scale askewity’s in many of his paintings.
I like the thought of the artist painting his spilled basket from the ground, where he fell while crossing the creek, giving him an odd point of view. Glad you liked the post, Bill.
Thanks, David. Yeah, maybe they should just attribute it to “the usual suspects”.
Never seen a still life set in landscape before – intriguing
It’s not very common, but I’ve come across it before, in paintings by both historic and a few contemporary artists, but I don’t know if there is a name for the motif.
Here are a few of them:
Wonderful. This flemish / dutch Bruegel dynasty maybe gives us some early flavour of ‘belgian surrealism’… giant fruits in a landscape.
Remember Bosch, Ensor, Delvaux and Magritte…
Thanks, Eric. I certainly like to think of it that way.
Comments are closed.