About 55km (35 miles) Southeast of Paris is a stretch of forest that could be considered the cradle of the modern practice of painting “en plein air” (“in the plain air” or simply “outdoors”), as well as the approach to painting that came to be called the “Barbizon School” and the style derived from them that would develop into French Impressionism.
Here, artists like Jean-Baptiste Camille Corot, Théodore Rousseau, Jean-Francois Millet, Charles-François Daubigny and others gathered in the unofficial artists colony in the town of Barbizon, from which they could walk into the surrounding forrest, with their newly portable painting equipment in hand, and capture the drama and beauty of the still-wild landscape.
The practice of painting on location, while not entirely new, had not been practiced to such a degree or by such a large group of painters before, and the very choice these painters had made to make nature the center and subject of their paintings, rather than a backdrop for human activity, was radical; carrying forward the emphasis placed on landscape by English artist John Constable.
They were followed by the young Impressionist painters Claude Monet, Alfred Sisley, Frédéric Bazille and Auguste Renoir, who, at the urging of atelier master Charles Gleyre, traveled to the Fontainebleau Forest from nearby Paris to also exercise this new practice of painting directly from nature.
In the Forest of Fontainebleau: Painters and Photographers from Corot to Monet is a newly opened show at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., highlighting many of these painters, as well as artists in the new medium of photography, who found similar inspiration in the dramatic scenery of the forest.
Corot and Monet are the stars here, and Corot is the master; unsurprisingly as we are in his territory. Though most of the works here are large, finished studio works, you can see where they are informed by the open-air painting that they developed from, and many small location sketches are included as well. Here is not only the direct representation of nature and natural light, but the direct, open brushwork on which Impressionism, and many related schools of painting. would be based.
Corot is a favorite of mine, and will the subject of a dedicated future post, and he is at his finest here, with his remarkable presence for the individual “personalities” of trees in the midst of broader scenes.
Monet is presented as you rarely see him, as a mature painter, but prior to the development of the “Impressionist style”. Here is Monet in dark forest glades, painting directly and without the scattering of short brushstrokes, though obviously already fascinated with effect of dappled light and shade (image above, top). Sisley and Bazille are right at home with this style, and Renoir turns in terrific pieces as well. There are some famous works, like one of Monet’s preparatory panels for his abandoned attempt at Déjeunier sur l’Herbe, and Bazille’s Improvised Field Hospital, depicting Monet in bed nursing his banged-up leg.
Richard Parkes Bonington is represented by several pieces and Theodore Rousseau, who I was not that familiar with, impressed me with superb examples.
I was struck in particular by the work of other artists with whom I was only vaguely or not at all familiar, like Théodore d’Aligny, Robert-Leopold Leprince; wonderful work by Alexandre Desgoffe and a stunning landscape painting by Rosa Bonheur (image above, bottom); who I usually associate only with depictions of animals.
The exhibition is wonderful and quite extensive. It runs at the National Gallery in Washington until June 8, 2008. It then moves to the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston for a run from July 13-October 29, 2008. There is a short slide-show of some of the works on the exhibition’s page. There is also a catalog accompanying the exhibit, In the Forest of Fontainebleau: Painters and Photographers from Corot to Monet that has reasonably good reproductions (the Amazon link I give here is to the $60 hardback, there is also a $40 paperback).
If you get to the exhibition, don’t miss the permanent display of Small French Paintings, also in the East wing, which features many of the same painters; as well as more of their work still on display in the main galleries of the permanent collection (not to mention the NGA’s other amazing treasures, like the 3 [or 4, depending on your point of view] exquisite Vermeers…, but I digress).
I’ve come away from In the Forest of Fontainebleau not only renewed in my admiration for Corot, and with a fresh view of early Impressionism, but convinced more than ever that, with all due respect to Constable, the Forest of Fontainebleau is the birthplace of modern landscape painting.
9 Replies to “In the Forest of Fontainebleau”
Wait; is the bottom one Corot?
No. Top is Monet, bottom is Rosa Bonheur.
I’m planning a dedicated post on Corot, in the meanwhile, Artcyclopedia has plenty of links:
Those are beautiful paintings. I love opening something up and falling in love with a painting, and I was shocked to see 2 great landscapes that are new to me. Especially one by Monet… it’s not exactly like he suffers from a lack of attention on his paintings.
It is fun to look back and see the roots of impressionism in paintings from this group, as landscape became a subject in its own right. Some of the first paintings that made me want to work on the landscape were Corot’s. They were small paintings he did on a trip to Italy. I saw them in a book, I think called “In The Light of Italy.” His plein air paintings had simplicity in composition (masses of shapes) along with a great sense of daylight. I’ll look forward to your post on him
I think an argument can be made that Corot’s trip to Italy could also be seen as the beginnings of widespread plein air painting, but he actually started to paint outdoors in Fontainebleau before his trip to Italy.
I’d be willing to bet that there are a lot of wonderful early Monets like this in the basements of museums; relegated there because they have a “bright” one on display instead.
The top painting is one of my favorite of Monet! Thanks for sharing this, Charlie.
The bottom one remind me Ivan Shishkins works.:o)
I hadn’t thought of the comparison to Shishkin, but I agree.
I know that Shishkin traveled in Europe, at least Eastern Europe, but I don’t know if he had any contact with the artists who painted in the Fontainebleau area.
For readers who aren’t already familiar with him, see my post on Ivan Shishkin.
Thanks for the post! Great pictures, it looks like a very interesting place.
Currently reseaching a painting by Robert Leopold LePrince (Waterfall at Reichenbach). Difficult. I would love to know about his piece in this exhibition. Was there a exhibition catalog, or can you tell me anything about his painting that was in this exhibit?? Thanks
Comments are closed.