Lines and Colors art blog
  • R.J. Matson

    R.J. Matson
    Whenever the topic of political cartoonists comes up, the question of political bias raises its smirking little head and I get comments about “How could you feature this flaming liberal terrorist sympathizer?” or “How could you showcase such a right wing fascist nut case?”.

    I’ll start out by saying that RJ Matson is unabashedly liberal, unabashedly a Bush basher and also unabashedly a Clinton basher. Either he likes Obama, or simply doesn’t find him a very interesting character to skewer.

    Of course, any editorial cartoonist worth their salt will go after the people currently in power, they’re the ones stirring things up, after all, and the ones we need to be reminded to keep our eye on.

    While politicians who do bad and/or stupid things make life difficult for the rest of us, they’re paydirt for political cartoonists and satirists.

    Regardless of whether a particular cartoonist’s political leanings match our own, we should be able to look at them for their drawing style.

    Matson, particularly in the past couple of years, has been working in a line and color style that owes more to the simplicity of classic newspaper comics than to the pen and ink crosshatch style usually associated with political cartoons.

    In his older cartoons, he employs a style more in keeping with that tradition, but even there he is somewhat eccentric, and you’ll find stylistic references to other cartoonists like William Stout, Ron Cobb, New Yorker cartoonists like Jack Ziegler, even the historic political cartoons of Thomas Nast.

    You’ll also references to 50’s EC horror comics, 60’s superhero comics and other pop culture visual landmarks.

    It’s his current, open, line and color style that I particularly enjoy. Though he draws the cartoons so they will be effective either in black and white or in color (as you can see in the R.J. Matson archive on Cagle Cartoons), when reproduced in color, they have a nice feeling of direct drawing, and intentional coloring. It’s hard to put my finger on what it is about the style, but it just feels like Matson has utilized just the line work and just the color elements that he needs to nail his subject, with nothing included that doesn’t add to the effectiveness of the image; which is, of course, the essence of good cartooning.

    Matson is the editorial cartoonist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, The New York Observer and Roll Call. In addition to his editorial cartoons, his gag cartoons and comic illustrations have appeared in many other publications, including The New Yorker, The Nation, The Daily News, The Washington Post, Rolling Stone and MAD Magazine. He has done cover art for the Capitol Steps comedy group and has illustrated several books.

    Matson has been the Secretary of the National Cartoonists Society and is on the Board of Advisors of the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art in New York.

    His web site includes a selection of his illustrations, as well as an extensive archive of his cartoons. The latter can be viewed by publication, selected “Greatest Hits”, or in total. Greatest hits can give you a quick overview of some of his most popular cartoons, but if you like his work, the “All” choice makes for a nice mixture of national and local cartoons.



    Categories:
    ,


  • Cecilia Beaux

    Cecilia Beaux
    I think of portrait painting as being exceptionally demanding.

    If you paint an image of a tree, and it doesn’t look accurately like a specific tree, no one will notice as long as it looks correct as a tree. Human beings, however, have an extraordinary facility (probably genetically hardwired) to recognize and understand the human form, and any deviation is easily detected.

    Even more remarkable is our ability to discriminate between small variations in subtle features, and immediately recognize one face out of hundreds of thousands, even when that face is aged or young and overall proportions are radically different.

    How much more difficult is it then, to not only portray an individual accurately, but to also do so with a artistic flair and mastery of painting technique on the order of that shown by Cecilia Beaux.

    Beaux was one of the finest American portrait painters of the late 19th and early 20th Centuries, putting her in the company of many great artists. She fares well in the comparison, in my eyes showing second as an American painter of portraits only to John Singer Sargent (it’s probably just a personal preference that I like her work even more than that of Eakins).

    By any measure, I would rank her as one of the major American artists, period.

    Her beautifully subtle application of impressionistic color, masterful draftsmanship and confident freedom of brushwork easily put her on par with the best of the “American Impressionist” painters who were her contemporaries.

    Like those painters, and the other master painters of the 19th Century, her star faded in the course of the systematic campaign to devalue representational art perpetrated by the post-war modernist art establishment in the late 20th Century.

    The art world has been slowly coming to its senses in recent decades and artists like Beaux are once again reclaiming their rightful place in art history.

    Beaux was born in Philadelphia. Her mother died shortly after her birth and her father returned to France, leaving her and her elder sister in the care of their maternal grandmother and aunts. Her family encouraged her interest in art, however, and Beaux started to earn her living as an artist at the age of 18.

    At that point she was making lithographs, painting decorative paintings on china and small scale portraits, giving private art lessons and teaching at Miss Sanford’s School.

    She became skilled as a scientific illustrator, and created fossil drawings for Edward Cope, a pioneering paleontologist and curator at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia.

    Beaux attended the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, where her instructors likely included Thomas Eakins, and supplemented her studies with instruction from other Philadelphia painters, including William Sartain.

    She eventually went to Europe and, as was common for American artists of her time, trained at the Académie Julian, where she studied with William-Adolphe Bouguereau, among others, as well as at the Académie Colarossi, and an art colony on the Atlantic coast in Brittany.

    She returned to Philadelphia and quickly became one of the most prominent and sought-out portrait painters in the country, painting prominent members of Philadelphia society in an urbane style and on a large scale. She ennobled her sitters with dignified poses, impressive backgrounds and an overall approach that is sometimes referred to as “the grand manner”. This approach, as well as her admirable facility as a painter, invite further comparison to Sargent.

    She returned to the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts as an instructor, becoming the Academy’s first female faculty member, and continued to teach there even after she moved to New York to be more available to the créme de la créme of society who were her patrons.

    Her portraits included not only members of the monied class, but notable figures like Henry James and Edith Roosevelt. Eleanor Roosevelt honored her as “…the American woman who had made the greatest contribution to the culture of the world” in 1933.

    The American painter William Merritt Chase called her “…not only the greatest living woman painter, but the greatest who has ever lived”.

    She was the first American woman invited to display in the Hall of portraits in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence, and her work is in the collection of the Musée d’Orsay. Her paintings are also in major museums across the U.S.

    A major exhibition, Cecilia Beaux, American Figure Painter, that started last fall at the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, and then travelled to the Tacoma Art Museum, is currently at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, here in Philadelphia, where she studied and taught, until April 13th, 2008.

    I apologize for not giving you a heads-up about this show sooner, but I just got to see it myself yesterday. (Image above: Man with the Cat, portrait of Henry Sturgis Drinker)

    It is a sweeping and large scale exhibition, and I came away with my opinion of the stature and ability of this superb painter not only reinforced, but heightened.


    Cecilia Beaux, American Figure Painter, at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts to April 13, 2008
    Exhibition review from High Museum at TFAOI
    Cecilia Beaux in PAFA permanent collection
    Cecilia Beaux at ARC
    The Athenaeum (25 images)
    CGFA (2 images)
    WorldImages (7 iamges)
    Ciudad de la pintura (ES)
    Bio and gallery on National Museum of Women in the Arts
    Cecilia Beaux Papers Online at Smithsonian Archives of American Art
    Bio on Butler Art
    Museum list on World Wide Art Resources
    Artcyclopedia (links and museum list)

    Categories:


  • Timothy Bush

    Timothy Bush - illustration for Benjamin McFadden and the Robot Babysitter
    Timothy Brush is a children’s book illustrator originally from Pennsylvania and, after living in Illinois, Ohio and Texas as well as Vienna, Rome and the Greek Islands, is now settled in New York City.

    Bush studied literature in college and is self-taught as an artist. He points out (jokingly, I hope) that he is “completely unqualified to do what I do”. Were he serious, I would have to disagree, of course, as I think he is admirably suited to his role as a children’s book illustrator; both because of his delightful illustrations, and because of the way he describes his school visits.

    Not only does he take the time to talk to school classes about the process of illustration and the creation of books, he makes a point of showing them that the real world process of being an artist or writer isn’t a fantasy story, and that professional artists have difficulties, setbacks and disappointments, as well as successes, just as kids do. His talks usually include reading aloud and sessions with everyone drawing together.

    Bush’s illustration style varies from simple, almost cartoon-like line and color drawings, to more elaborate and textured watercolor paintings.

    You can view his online portfolio either by category, such as action, animals, landscape, etc, or by book title. The two viewing paths are only partially redundant, and there are images to be found in both areas that are not repeated in the other.

    In referencing his illustrations by book title, my favorites are Grunt! The Primitive Cave Boy and Benjamin McFadden and the Robot Babysitter (image above). These are some of his more detailed illustrations. The former leans more toward adult book illustration, with realistic landscapes as a backdrop for cartoonish characters and nicely rendered prehistoric mammals. The latter is a visual treat, with lots of rich details, textures and fanciful designs. Robot Babysitter has just been optioned as a feature film by Walt Disney Pictures.

    I was also struck by his illustrations for Janey and the Famous Author, in which he again blends somewhat stylized characters with realistic backgrounds, in particular nicely rendered watercolor landscapes and architecture. In these, Bush uses texture and lighting in the backgrounds to create an effective emotional tone for particular points in the story.

    [Link via Ann Marshall (see my post on Ann Marshall)]



    Categories:


  • The Face of Leonardo?

    Leonardo da Vinci - presumed self-portrait
    It has long been assumed that the red chalk drawing shown above is a self-portrait by Leonardo da Vinci.

    It certainly looks like what we expect or want the great Renaissance artist to look like, his penetrating deep-set eyes gazing out at us from distant past, weighted with the perhaps painful wisdom of great insight into the nature of the world and the ways of man; but its status as a self portrait has been called into question in recent years by prominent art historians; leading to the inevitable question of whether we really know what Leonardo looked like.

    There are even those who claim, based on the assumption that the above image is a self-portrait, that similarities between key points in the facial structure show that the enigmatic face of the Mona Lisa could have been modeled on his own.

    I don’t buy that one, but I have always accepted the above image as a self portrait, mainly because I recognize in it that “look” that I’ve seen in hundreds of self-portraits. It’s a look that I associate with a particular shift in mental state associated with drawing, something to do with where and how the eyes are focusing (see my post on Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain).

    It’s a little hard to tell from this reproduction, and I was hard pressed to find a better one on the web. This is a very old, and very delicate, chalk drawing that is difficult to reproduce, and to see it more clearly you need to look for it in print, as on the back cover of Taschen’s excellent volume Leonardo da Vinci: Sketches and Drawings by Frank Zollner (part of a two volume set of his paintings and drawings – technically not in print in the US, but you can sometimes find it used or even discounted). There, and in other good reproductions, you can see the way the eyes are focused right at the viewer (or a mirror) and have that particular look of an artist deep in the mindset of concentrated drawing.

    Still, scholars are saying the assumption that this is Leonardo is in question.

    The only portrait of Leonardo for which we have reasonably reliable attribution is Verrocchio’s David, a statue for which Leonardo is believed to have posed as a boy of 15, but it’s difficult to draw immediate comparisons between that and the image of a man who is at least in his late 60’s.

    This all leads to a fascinating four-minute presentation at this year’s TED (Technology Entertainment Design) Conference by Siegfried Woldhek, in which he does an astonishing analysis of Da Vinci’s drawings, systematically narrowing them down to possible candidates for self-portraits.

    Siegfried Woldhek is a well known Dutch illustrator whose speciality is faces. He’s drawn over a thousand of them, mostly political and literary portraits and caricatures, for newspapers and magazines in Europe.

    Drawing on his own experience (if you’ll excuse the expression) and the assumption that Leonardo, who drew everything around him with a passion bordering on obsession, must have created some self portraits (an assumption with which I agree), Woldhek searches through Leonardo’s drawings for evidence of a record of his own visage.

    The resulting talk is a wonderfully condensed argument, establishing (without question in my mind) that we do indeed know what Leonardo da Vinci looked like, and from more than one image.

    [Link to TED video via BoingBoing]



    Categories:
    ,


  • Barrett Bailey

    Barrett bailey
    Barrett Bailey is an Alabama artist working in the classical realist tradition.

    Though you will find small still life paintings and an occasional landscape in his online galleries, Bailey is primarily a figure and portrait artist. The Paintings section of his site includes paintings in a range of sizes and degrees of finish, from small portrait sketches to larger scale figure works. For an idea of the scale of his more recent paintings, glance at the photograph of his studio on the Bio page.

    Particularly appealing to me are his drawings, both figure drawings and portraits. These are primarily in graphite or charcoal, often on toned paper, and have a variety of surface textures.

    Bailey’s site includes a video of the creation of one of his drawings in time lapse, condensing two an a half hours of drawing into less than two minutes. (I mentioned this video previously in my post about ArtDemonstrations.com.)

    His bio section also includes a Bookshelf, with some of the books he recommends on figure drawing, portrait painting and related subjects.

    Barrett exhibits in Alabama and New York, where he studied at the New York Academy of Art. He in an instructor at Huntingdon College and teaches private Portrait Drawing Classes in Montgomery.



    Categories:
    ,


  • Marco Sassone

    Marco Sassone
    I have to say that I don’t normally respond well to paintings in which representational imagery has been “pushed” stylistically to the point where it borders on being non-representational. Contemporary artists often lose me at that juncture. There seems to be a point where it becomes boring for me, and I seldom follow artists who work in that direction.

    Marcon Sassone’s work, however, grabbed my attention and appealed to me right off, even though it fits that description. Sassone’s brusque brushstrokes threaten to break up the representational image, as if it were on the verge of dissolution, but he holds back just enough, and includes enough elements of visual interest in his paintings, that they work both as representations of real scenes and severe abstractions from them (all art being “abstract” in the strict sense of that word).

    His urban landscapes, in particular, have a feeling of vibration and almost random energy, within which they still form palpable images of real places.

    Sassone was born in Tuscany, Italy, studied at the Instituto Galilei and later with Silvio Loffredo, a professor of art at the Academia i Florence.

    He later emigrated to California, though a number of his paintings are from a series of views of Venice. He currently works in Toronto and Florence, and exhibits in the U.S. and Europe.

    There is currently an Exhibition of his work at the Odon Wagner Gallery in Toronto, that features a number of his views of that city. It runs from April 4 to April 26, 2008.

    The images on the Wagner Gallery site are somewhat larger than those on Sassone’s own site, giving you a better feeling for the texture and surface character of his work.

    [Link via Art Knowledge News]



    Categories:


Vasari Handcraftes artist's oil colors

Charley’s Picks
Bookshop.org

(Bookshop.org affilliate links; sales benefit independent bookshop owners; I get a small percentage to help support my work on Lines and Colors)

John Singer Sargent: Watercolors
John Singer Sargent: Watercolors

Sorolla the masterworks
Sorolla: the masterworks

The Art Spirit
The Art Spirit

Rendering in Pen and Ink
Rendering in Pen and Ink

Urban Sketching: Understanding Perspective
Urban Sketching: Understanding Perspective

World of Urban Sketching
World of Urban Sketching

Daily Painting
Daily Painting

Drawing on the right side of the brain
Drawing on the right side of the brain

Understanding Comics
Understanding Comics

Charley’s Picks
Amazon

(Amazon.com affiliate links; sales go to a larger yacht for Jeff Bezos; but I get a small percentage to help support my work on Lines and Colors)

John Singer Sargent: Watercolors
John Singer Sargent: Watercolors

Sorolla the masterworks
Sorolla: the masterworks

The Art Spirit
The Art Spirit

Rendering in Pen and Ink
Rendering in Pen and Ink

Urban Sketching: Understanding Perspective
Urban Sketching: Understanding Perspective

World of Urban Sketching
World of Urban Sketching

Daily Painting
Daily Painting

Drawing on the right side of the brain
Drawing on the right side of the brain

Understanding Comics
Understanding Comics